Fraudband

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
Jovial_Monk

Re: Fraudband

Post by Jovial_Monk » Fri May 17, 2013 10:34 am

Not out all that soon, and no one expects that speed in real life.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Fraudband

Post by Rorschach » Fri May 17, 2013 10:42 am

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

hahahahaha how little you know it'll probably be out before they finish the rollout.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Jovial_Monk

Re: Fraudband

Post by Jovial_Monk » Fri May 17, 2013 3:22 pm

roach obviously knows nothing about IT.

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11788
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Fraudband

Post by Super Nova » Fri May 17, 2013 4:45 pm

Jovial_Monk wrote:
Super Nova wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:Oh noes! How will monk transmit his hip replacement x-ray from his living room...his brain scan will take double the time to upload so his itchy nuts might miss a scratch!

Woe betide us all!
:roll:
He will have trouble transmitting it but no trouble receiving it. Symmetry.... :rofl
The above is Political discussion? Sounds more like the Vortex!

Copper cannot be made as symmetrical as fibre—VDSL takes so much frequency to download upload. Unless you use like 8 bonded, high quality pairs per premises and we rarely have one good quality pair here in Australia.
That's a bit unfair Monk. The politics behind this discussion is that I claim the government is wasting money around their strategy to implement technology. So technology is part of this debate as clearly you have embraced. Therefore your technical comments are open to challenge.

"Copper cannot be made as symmetrical as fibre—VDSL"

The key word in that sentence is "as". That is an incorrect statement. Transmission over copper can be fully symmetrical. I have hand written such a protocol over a single twisted pair.

" takes so much frequency to download upload." Don't understand that statement.

"Unless you use like 8 bonded, high quality pairs per premises and we rarely have one good quality pair here in Australia". Yes, the better the quality the less lose and interference so you can have a higher transition rate. The point was about Symmetry.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

Jovial_Monk

Re: Fraudband

Post by Jovial_Monk » Fri May 17, 2013 4:52 pm

But we would have to run all that copper from nodes to premises. It is nonsense! Much less symmetrical, much less bandwidth, any advance in copper brings disadvantage elsewhere. And even brand new copper corrodes.

Copper has had its day, fibre is better, cheaper, can be upgraded almost indefinitely and does not corrode, being made of glass.

Why keep bullshitting about copper? The copper here is ratshit, barely capable of transmitting voice, can’t do that after rain in increasing areas.

Do it once, do it right, do it with fibre.

Aussie

Re: Fraudband

Post by Aussie » Fri May 17, 2013 5:00 pm

Do it once, do it right, do it with fibre.
I don't understand all the technical stuff but I do recognize that, and add.......'while it is cheaper than it will be later.'

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11788
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Fraudband

Post by Super Nova » Fri May 17, 2013 5:17 pm

Jovial_Monk wrote:But we would have to run all that copper from nodes to premises. It is nonsense! Much less symmetrical, much less bandwidth, any advance in copper brings disadvantage elsewhere. And even brand new copper corrodes.

Copper has had its day, fibre is better, cheaper, can be upgraded almost indefinitely and does not corrode, being made of glass.

Why keep bullshitting about copper? The copper here is ratshit, barely capable of transmitting voice, can’t do that after rain in increasing areas.

Do it once, do it right, do it with fibre.
You are the one that started trying to sound knowledgeable with you it's not symmetrical statement. That was bullshit. I am not promoting copper. I was just addressing your bullshit argument.

It appears you don't know so much about IT. So consider that before you speak BS.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Fraudband

Post by IQS.RLOW » Fri May 17, 2013 5:25 pm

Aussie wrote:
Do it once, do it right, do it with fibre.
I don't understand all the technical stuff but I do recognize that, and add.......'while it is cheaper than it will be later.'
Then STFU because its obvious you know nothing about everything
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Jovial_Monk

Re: Fraudband

Post by Jovial_Monk » Fri May 17, 2013 6:12 pm

I read enough to know I am right. And the copper is crap.

Then there are the power requirements for anything with copper in it, esp FTTN. Horrendous. Turncoat has accepted that basically #Fraudband costs as much as FTTH given high copper maintenance (and initial fortune wasted remediating and re-running copper) and power. That tells me he is not serious, that #Fraudband is just there to get the Libs over the line 14/9 when all broadband work will be stopped and forgotten about—Libs want austerity not nation building.
Last edited by Jovial_Monk on Fri May 17, 2013 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Fraudband

Post by IQS.RLOW » Fri May 17, 2013 6:14 pm

It has managed fine until the ALP got involved.
Perhaps it's their fault too?

Everything they touch turns to crap...
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 61 guests