Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:47 am
boxy wrote:IQS.RLOW wrote:boxy wrote:I see no reason to even touch on that subject, if you can't even admit that global warming has happened.
1. Where have I admitted that
2. Touch on the subject...go on
I say you can't admit it, and you demand I show you where you did admit it?
Are you drunk?
You have assigned me a position I have never taken. It's your obligation to prove that "I can't even admit that global warming has happened"
When you've done that...you can then address this
So are you saying that if there was no human C02 in the atmosphere that graph would be majorly different?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11786
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:47 pm
So are you saying that if there was no human C02 in the atmosphere that graph would be majorly different?
I would say YES.
The records indicate that CO2 and other greenshouse gasses really started to grow post the industrial revolution. So without human activity generating these they would be about what they were pre-industrial revolution.
There is no other explaination. No other factors, sun activity has not increased, no massive erruptions, nothing has changed except our activity.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
Aussie
Post
by Aussie » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:59 pm
You live there....my In-Laws (as do other close relations) live in London where last century, these chimneys.....and their industrial equivalents....were spewing carbon into the atmosphere for almost 75% of the year. They called it smog. Damage done. I think there is less 'smog' these days. Do you agree?
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:18 pm
Super Nova wrote:So are you saying that if there was no human C02 in the atmosphere that graph would be majorly different?
I would say YES.
The records indicate that CO2 and other greenshouse gasses really started to grow post the industrial revolution. So without human activity generating these they would be about what they were pre-industrial revolution.
There is no other explaination. No other factors, sun activity has not increased, no massive erruptions, nothing has changed except our activity.
How would you have explained the Ice Ages SN?
A sudden lessening of man made CO2 in the atmosphere?
/
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:52 pm
Aussie wrote:You live there....my In-Laws (as do other close relations) live in London where last century, these chimneys.....and their industrial equivalents....were spewing carbon into the atmosphere for almost 75% of the year. They called it smog. Damage done. I think there is less 'smog' these days. Do you agree?
Smog is not carbon dioxide, doofus.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Aussie
Post
by Aussie » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:53 pm
Did I say it was?
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:56 pm
You said 'they' called it smog.
Go start a thread on smog if you want. This one is for global warming.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Aussie
Post
by Aussie » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:08 pm
You said 'they' called it smog.
Yes, I did.
This one is for global warming.
No shit, Sherlock. Wonder why I posted that photo? Silly me.
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:12 pm
Aussie wrote:You said 'they' called it smog.
Yes, I did.
This one is for global warming.
No shit, Sherlock. Wonder why I posted that photo? Silly me.
Yes, why did you post a photo of smog producing chimneys in a thread about global warming. They are unrelated.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Aussie
Post
by Aussie » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:16 pm
Yes, why did you post a photo of smog producing chimneys in a thread about global warming.
I didn't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
