Religion of pieces of human flesh

[Rorschach]

I've got lots of photos of riots......and most of them do not involve Muslims.

And that excuses the violent behaviour of many Muslims around the world 'in the name of Islam' how?

It doesn't. But, it puts it into perspective. You and your bigotted mates reckon the only bad bastards are Muslims.

Lying again Arsie... how unusual.

[Aussie]

.....and you still have no idea what that riot was about, OR who was protesting.

[Rorschach]

I don't apologise for or excuse criminal behaviour. I also don't exclusively concentrate my focus on riots by Muslims, and like you, ignore the many more by non Muslims.

We don't focus on riots... by anyone.... you are just strange.

We also aren't in denial about the problems the West has with many from this fundamentalist culture.
Unlike yourself.

[Black Orchid]

.....and you still have no idea what that riot was about, OR who was protesting.

I have already posted who was protesting. The riot took place at the Israeli Embassy in protest against the military presence in Gaza.

Muslim/Jewish conflict has nothing to do with Islam?

[Rorschach]

Like I said... he is an idiot.

Violent clashes broke out near the Israeli embassy in London yesterday as tens of thousands marched in protest against the military action in Gaza. Shop windows were smashed and police pelted with missiles by masked youths near the embassy during the largest demonstration in Britain against the Israeli offensive.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/ja ... ssy-police" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

check out the link and the associated picture.

yeah nothing to do with Islam or muslims
yeah it was all the fault of the british

same old same old same disgusting behaviour...
just the usual suspects with the usual useful fools of the progressive Left.

what about the global crap when someone drew a cartoon of Mohammed?
Oh right nothing to see there, no muslims involved there.

As for Arsie... he lies through every orifice.

[Black Orchid]

This is why I rarely bother. Unbelievable isn't it?

First we have Linda blaming bad polling on an article that hadn't even been written yet and now we have Aussie trying to prove it isn't only Muslims that riot. How? By posting pics of Muslims rioting.

[Rorschach]

Our ABC
What a joke.

WHERE IS YOUR PRIMARY AND OFFICIAL SOURCE?
Tim Blair
Monday, May, 27, 2013, (2:12pm)


There are none so blind as those at the ABC.

Last week the billion-dollars-per-year national broadcaster ran an extraordinary news piece on the savage London killing of off-duty soldier Lee Rigby. Readers will recall the words from one of Rigby’s murderers, Mujahid Adeboloja, who obligingly hung around following the slaying to explain himself.

“We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you. You people will never be safe,” Islamic covert Adeboloja said, his blood-soaked hands providing dramatic emphasis. “There are many, many ayah throughout the Koran that we must fight them as they fight us, an eye for an eye, a tooth for tooth.”

Several hours after video of Adeboloja’s declaration had begun to be broadcast around the world, the ABC’s man in London told evening news viewers what he knew about the killing. It turned out to be less than was known to anybody who’d been paying even vague interest.

“What happened was clear,” the correspondent said. “The motivation, less so.”

Well, apart from Allah and all of those ayah in the Koran. Take them out of the frame, as the ABC naturally did, and Adeboloja’s motivation does indeed become slightly unclear. Removing the central component of a news story will tend to do that.

Our other tax-funded broadcaster, SBS, out-evaded even the ABC’s item, which at least managed to mention Islam in passing (apparently London’s Muslim community fears backlash; exactly why, nobody at the ABC could tell you). In nearly seven minutes of non-news from the UK, SBS’s multicultural media messengers managed to completely miss the Muslim aspect of last week’s murder.

As Andrew Bolt noticed, SBS somehow failed to mention even once the words “Muslim”, “Islam”, “Allah” or “Koran”. This exchange, between SBS host Hannah Sinclair and London-based Australian journalist Adam McIlrick, summed up the network’s coverage:

Sinclair: “Is there any indication of the background of the suspects involved?’

McIlrick: “No indication as yet, Hannah.”

That was 12 hours after Mujahid Adeboloja had given quite a few indications regarding his background. “They wanted to be seen. They wanted to be heard,” McIlrick offered about the killers. “And you’d have to say that’s exactly what’s happened.”

Except on either the ABC or SBS.

Last Friday I joined 2UE’s Jason Morrison to discuss this innovative approach to news gathering, whereby the news aspect is carefully subtracted and a shroud of mysterious complexity is drawn over clear and known events.

Telephone complaints began to arrive even while we were on air. Afterwards, a couple of ABC types emailed Morrison to explain how a proper news organisation handles these sorts of things.

“What you fail to understand [is] that the onus of proof for ABC News to run with aspects of a story are vastly different to what maybe your organisation or Tim Blare at the Terror would require to go with,” the first complainant wrote. In other words, a killer’s confession just isn’t good enough. Apparently the ABC needs independent verification from someone who isn’t holding a machete dripping with blood.

“Or perhaps you do understand this,” the complainant continued, “and it doesn’t suit your cause?” This is brilliant. The ABC censors information, and we’re the ones running an agenda. But it gets better. Next, the ABC’s defender asks this question:

“Where is your primary and official source that these crimes were carried out in the name of Islam as you are happy to tell your listeners?”

Sources don’t come much more primary than the guy who did it. You know, the South London lad with deep crimson arterial blood all over him, standing a few metres from the corpse of the man he’s just killed and ranting about Allah. But maybe that’s not “official” enough for the ABC, which presumably is still waiting for word from the Central Authority of Islamic Responsibility (Decapitation Division).

“If we get it wrong it can be an international incident and inflame enormous social disharmony,” the email continued. Considering that a body is lying in a London street having been hacked and slashed in manner reminiscent of a pig’s slaughter, the point of social disharmony may have already been reached. But I take the ABC’s point. Inflaming things could get someone hurt.

“Please understand,” the email ended, “that ABC news is not just another news service.” Let’s edit that, as the ABC edits certain footage from the UK: the ABC is not a news service. There. Fixed it for you.

Another complainant also took up the social disharmony theme. “Mr Morrison,” the ABC staffer wrote, “the ABC does not exist to inflame racial tensions like Tim Blair and you seem to enjoy.” How does that explain, then, the ABC’s massive coverage of racist abuse directed at Sydney Swans star Adam Goodes last Friday night? If Mujahid Adeboloja had been a teenage girl at the MCG, you get the feeling the ABC would have heard him loud and clear.

This staffer also demanded further evidence. “What proof do you have that these crimes were even carried out by a Muslim man or in the name of the religion?” Again, I refer you to the fellow’s exact words, which the ABC resolutely refuses to hear.

“ABC TV and radio have a commitment to all Australians not just a narrow portion that you may target,” the email signed off. “Perhaps it would be beneficial if you understood the ABC editorial charter.”

I’ve just re-read the ABC’s charter. Still can’t find the section about compulsory spinelessness. Possibly it’s been edited.

[Aussie]

You are wrong Poachy. Tell me about this one......

[Aussie]

.....and this one...

[Aussie]

Bloody Muslims.....



(I've got lots of piccies of that one, NOIQ.)