Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

[Rorschach]

Back to that old obsessive Howard Hating I see mantra

You gotta ask yourself why has Gillard been so dodgy on this issue?

[Neferti]

No evidence against Gillard? Here it is

BRANDIS: There has been some debate this morning in the media about the claim made by the position that Julia Gillard broke the law in relation to the establishment and operation of the Australian Workers Union Workplace Reform Association. In order to get to the bottom of this affair, the Opposition, as you know, yesterday called for the establishment of a judicial inquiry. I think the terms of reference that we proposed for that judicial inquiry were released by the Opposition Leader’s office yesterday but for ease of reference for you I will give you give you a copy of them as well as a small bundle of documents I want to take you to.

Now, Parliament is a political forum and debates between journalists and politicians about the law are seldom very illuminating but let me explain to you the basis upon which or the principal basis upon which the Opposition says Julia Gillard broke the law. We say that she broke the law because the Australian Workers Union Workplace Reform Association was established as a sham to facilitate a fraud and by her participation in its establishment, Julia Gillard was a party to that crime. Now, it is against the law of every Australian State, including the law of Western Australia, to provide a materially false statement when a person is under a statutory obligation to provide information to an authority. That is the effect of section 170 of the Western Australian Criminal Code in the terms in which it was drawn at the time of these events in 1992.

More here:-

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... ere_it_is/

AND

Here:-

http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2012/11 ... andal.html

[Neferti]

FYI Monk.

Here is the OFFICIAL Brandis Transcript on his Official Letterhead, as quoted (see above) by Bolt, who got it off Michael Smith's site.

http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2012/11 ... andal.html

There IS EVIDENCE somewhere (on Smith's site) that Gillard originally wrote to the WA Consumer Affairs and they knocked back the application. She then wrote them again and CHANGED THE WORDING of what the AWUWRA was set up to do. They then accepted the application. She did know what it was to be used for. This file has since "gone missing" from the WA Consumer Affairs, although the actual official folder with the number, etc. is still there. Somebody has been "fiddling" with the files! She is a LIAR of the first order.

[Neferti]

Then there is the matter of the Power of Attorney. She was up to her eyes in the fraud. This person should NOT be Prime Minister. The sooner they sack her, the better. Like Tony Abbott said "she's a crook" (in Parliament, mind you, so she can't sue).

http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/

[IQS.RLOW]

Another example of Gillards "oh I just did clerical work for them" Socialist Forum...an extension of the Communist Party

http://michaelsmithnews.typepad.com/.a/ ... 7aa970b-pi

[Neferti]

Another example of Gillards "oh I just did clerical work for them" Socialist Forum...an extension of the Communist Party

http://michaelsmithnews.typepad.com/.a/ ... 7aa970b-pi

Another LIE. Typist indeed. That's the crap she fed the Media. She drafted the "Association Rules" or whatever, then cut and pasted those for the AWU (she admitted that in the "exit interview"). She will dig her own grave. She is already showing the sleepless nights, pale face, lines and bags under the eyes. .

[IQS.RLOW]

What's the bet once Gillard gets the arse, she will do away with Timmy soon after

[Neferti]

What's the bet once Gillard gets the arse, she will do away with Timmy soon after

All she uses Timmy for is to bring in the newspaper, make her a cup of tea and draw her bath and he does her hair! Then he lounges in front of the TV all day. Don't they have "servants" at The Lodge? Timmy is having a great time with his nose in the trough!

Oh, Timmy's best mate in Shepparton, Milvan Muto, a Councillor, is in trouble with the Law.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victor ... 6505596681

[Black Orchid]

He should act now and get her to create a Timmy slush fund for discarded handbags

[Aussie]

No evidence against Gillard? Here it is

Naffy.....what Brandis says, what Bolt says, what Smith says, what Baker says is not evidence. It is nothing more than their biased opinion, completely inadmissible and is not evidence. It is irrelevant political clap trap.

Did you notice how that Reporter ran Brandis ragged with their very good questions of him?