Yea fascinating.Lucas wrote:I doubt Labia could have formed anything except a must see sitcom.
I have to say that was hilarious to watch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf10c/bf10c0e823dbc428e88d161e46e49887d6f52bec" alt="Shocked :shock:"
Yea fascinating.Lucas wrote:I doubt Labia could have formed anything except a must see sitcom.
I have to say that was hilarious to watch.
What we do know is that he's never bashed any womanskippy wrote:That signature of longfuckhead is a great point to bring up, spermy. I may well have been correct, Gillard didn't lead Labor to that election so will never know. What we do know is that the voters hate the women bashers guts as he's a lying kunt that lied to win government, the same things you accuse Labor of, they don't take kindly to lying kunts as the basher will soon find out.IQS.RLOW wrote:Do you really want to go there skip?
Your track record of predictions is almost on par with Monks![]()
I'm sure there are quite a few posters at Ozpol who have your failed predictions as signatures.
How many times did you get the Dudd/Dullard/Dudd circus wrong? Im pretty sure it was just about all of the time.
Even your own sig had something like 'If Gillard and Abbott go to the election Gillard is a shoe in'...by fuck did you get that one wrongEven the ALP could see she was a piece of shit who was hated by everyone and would have reduced the ALP to 20 seats.
Well that's rubbish... what we do know is that if a political party gets enough votes and has enough members voted in they can form Government.skippy wrote:It's not good for the country for either of the major parties to be in government for too long a time. One of our problems is that only the Labor or Liberal party can form gov all be it the Libs needing the poor old Nats to boost the numbers.
What difference would it make if the Libs and nats all had the same party name... the outcome would be the same. Oh and puhlease lets not dismiss the FACT that Green votes get preferenced almost exclusively to Labor.skippy wrote:Labor have never formed a formal coalition, like the Liberals do every time they're in government at a federal level.Lucas wrote:And the Labia didn't need the Buffoons who thought they would get NBN in the Booniesskippy wrote:It's not good for the country for either of the major parties to be in government for too long a time. One of our problems is that only the Labor or Liberal party can form gov all be it the Libs needing the poor old Nats to boost the numbers.
According to multiple women he has abused them, I believe them over him but I wouldn't expect a a dribbler like you to understand logic.Rorschach wrote:What we do know is that he's never bashed any womanskippy wrote:That signature of longfuckhead is a great point to bring up, spermy. I may well have been correct, Gillard didn't lead Labor to that election so will never know. What we do know is that the voters hate the women bashers guts as he's a lying kunt that lied to win government, the same things you accuse Labor of, they don't take kindly to lying kunts as the basher will soon find out.IQS.RLOW wrote:Do you really want to go there skip?
Your track record of predictions is almost on par with Monks![]()
I'm sure there are quite a few posters at Ozpol who have your failed predictions as signatures.
How many times did you get the Dudd/Dullard/Dudd circus wrong? Im pretty sure it was just about all of the time.
Even your own sig had something like 'If Gillard and Abbott go to the election Gillard is a shoe in'...by fuck did you get that one wrongEven the ALP could see she was a piece of shit who was hated by everyone and would have reduced the ALP to 20 seats.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nor raped one.
Nor started a fraudulent slush fund for a Unionist boyfriend.
What we do know is that the only poll that counts is the election.
what we do know is that there has been no poll on how many people actually hate his guts.![]()
![]()
Guess you missed Bob and Julias "historic" signing?Labor have never formed a formal coalition
Really, that isn't true now is it.skippy wrote:According to multiple women he has abused them, I believe them over him but I wouldn't expect a a dribbler like you to understand logic.Rorschach wrote:What we do know is that he's never bashed any womanskippy wrote: That signature of longfuckhead is a great point to bring up, spermy. I may well have been correct, Gillard didn't lead Labor to that election so will never know. What we do know is that the voters hate the women bashers guts as he's a lying kunt that lied to win government, the same things you accuse Labor of, they don't take kindly to lying kunts as the basher will soon find out.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nor raped one.
Nor started a fraudulent slush fund for a Unionist boyfriend.
What we do know is that the only poll that counts is the election.
what we do know is that there has been no poll on how many people actually hate his guts.![]()
![]()
Not a coalition, spermy, an agreement to not block bills, a big difference, have a five year old explain it to you.IQS.RLOW wrote:Guess you missed Bob and Julias "historic" signing?Labor have never formed a formal coalition
Give it up skip. You are just embarrassing yourself supporting the GALP buffoons and rapists.
Yes two is a multiple good one you can pass pre school now.Rorschach wrote: Really, that isn't true now is it.
What's a multiple? 2?
And I do note you have now changed your claim from woman basher to abuser...![]()
![]()
![]()
No need to be offensive to me for proving you wrong AGAIN Skippy, just stop telling lies.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests