Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:19 pm
Know anything about Carbon Chemistry Monkey Boy? What do you think wood is made of?
http://www.ipst.gatech.edu/faculty/raga ... 20Wood.pdf
Where do you think the plants get the carbon from?

DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
GeorgeH
Post
by GeorgeH » Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:29 pm
While some increase in CO2 (due the anthropogenic emissions) will boost plant growth there are two limits on this:
1. As the globe continues warming CO2 intake will decrease. It is night time temps that apply here, as night time temp minimums rise CO2 uptake decreases.
2. As CO2 in the atmosphere rises the uptake of nitrogen decreases.
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:32 pm
Wake me up when you stop the mindless regurgitation and address the posts.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
GeorgeH
Post
by GeorgeH » Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:36 pm
Look, the carbon cycle might be big news to you but it is old hat to me. The thread is about global warming and so I mention two effects of increasing atmospheric CO2 has on the carbon cycle.
Care to discuss those effects? Or is that beyond your knowledge and capabilities?
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:02 pm
No warming for 17 years.
Suck it, fuckbag.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
GeorgeH
Post
by GeorgeH » Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:31 pm
No warming for 16 years, says the junky.
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:45 pm
17 years.
Why are you denying the science?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
GeorgeH
Post
by GeorgeH » Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:56 pm
Am I?
I think you are clutching at straws to prevent you having to think about AGW or anything in the real world. Drugs and clear thinking don’t go together.
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:07 pm
GeorgeH wrote:Look, the carbon cycle might be big news to you but it is old hat to me. The thread is about global warming and so I mention two effects of increasing atmospheric CO2 has on the carbon cycle.
Care to discuss those effects? Or is that beyond your knowledge and capabilities?
I addressed your points.
I'm waiting for you 1/ to actually acknowledge mine and then 2/ respond to them.

DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
GeorgeH
Post
by GeorgeH » Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:15 pm
What, that trees (and grasses and stuff) are growing faster now due higher CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere? Said that.
I then pointed out there are limits to that.
The nitrogen one is especially important.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests