Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

[boxy]

Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue?

(1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes.
(2) Euthanasia
(3) What illicit drugs can be made legal.
(4) More or less power to the State Govts.
(5) Green energy policy.
(6) Nuclear power.
(7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?)


Why do homo rights have such a high priority?

Let's have a binding plebiscite on every possible important issue.
There are far more serious issues.

Why just print one issue on piece of paper when dozens of
issues could be printed on the same piece of paper?

I'll tell you why -

the politicians don't want us to have a say -
they want to decide for us.

We live in a fake democracy.

We live in a representative democracy. We delegate the decision making to people we trust to look into the issues of the day, and come to an informed decision, because the rest of us are far too often willfully misinformed, and we like it that way...

[Bobby]

Then why do we need a $122 million postal vote on one unimportant issue?

Mind you - that money will be borrowed -
we're bankrupt.

[boxy]

We're not bankrupt, and we don't need any type of plebiscite (postal or not). If the libs can change the definition of marriage when it suits their agenda, without a vote, they can take it to the parliament now, as well.

[boxy]

They're basically spending millions of dollars to allow their wreckers (howard, abbott, etc.) to spread fear and loathing, in order to win in a stacked popularity contest against historically hated opponents.

[Bobby]

They're basically spending millions of dollars to allow their wreckers (howard, abbott, etc.) to spread fear and loathing, in order to win in a stacked popularity contest against historically hated opponents.

Turnbull will never be forgiven for wasting $122 million on a stupid question about homos.


We are $575 Billion in debt
yet he has $122 million to waste.

http://www.australiandebtclock.com.au/

If Turnbull was fair he could find another 10 questions to add to the poll
or even as many as 100 questions.
Euthanasia is one question for sure.

[IQS.RLOW]

We're not bankrupt, and we don't need any type of plebiscite (postal or not). If the libs can change the definition of marriage when it suits their agenda, without a vote, they can take it to the parliament now, as well.

The libs never changed the definition, no matter how much you cultural Marxists want to bawl about it.

[Bobby]

So Mr IQ,
you're happy that your right wing leader Malcolm gives
his approval and his official PM assent for
2 blokes to sodomise each other and call it a marriage?

What would Bob Menzies have said?

[Redneck]

So Mr IQ,
What would Bob Menzies have said?

"I did but see him passing by and yet I love him till I die."

[Bobby]

So Mr IQ,
What would Bob Menzies have said?

"I did but see him passing by and yet I love him till I die."

Menzies was talking about a Queen.

[Rorschach]

We're not bankrupt, and we don't need any type of plebiscite (postal or not). If the libs can change the definition of marriage when it suits their agenda, without a vote, they can take it to the parliament now, as well.

They didn't change the MEANING of the ACT Boxy.
It still means what it used to.
Ask Labor they state that it merely confirms what it already existed as.