Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by IQS.RLOW » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:29 pm

Sir Bobby wrote:
the politicians don't want us to have a say -
they want to decide for us.


We live in a fake democracy.
Which politicians don't want us to have a say Bobby?
What side of politics do they come from? 8-)
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18866
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by Bobby » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:38 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:
Sir Bobby wrote:
the politicians don't want us to have a say -
they want to decide for us.


We live in a fake democracy.
Which politicians don't want us to have a say Bobby?
What side of politics do they come from? 8-)
I support:
Whatever side gives us a postal vote on 100 different issues -
with the democracy ruling - the result binding.

Until then I think they're all a load of power hungry megalomaniacs.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by IQS.RLOW » Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:02 pm

Sir Bobby wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:
Sir Bobby wrote:
the politicians don't want us to have a say -
they want to decide for us.


We live in a fake democracy.
Which politicians don't want us to have a say Bobby?
What side of politics do they come from? 8-)
I support:
Whatever side gives us a postal vote on 100 different issues -
with the democracy ruling - the result binding.

Until then I think they're all a load of power hungry megalomaniacs.
Thought so. Can't even bring yourself to blame the real culprits wrecking Australia. :roll:

It's because you're one of them. :smack
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18866
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by Bobby » Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:38 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote: Thought so. Can't even bring yourself to blame the real culprits wrecking Australia. :roll:

It's because you're one of them. :smack
I am out there every day building this country -
making it a better place.
What do you do?

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by IQS.RLOW » Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:40 pm

Sir Bobby wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote: Thought so. Can't even bring yourself to blame the real culprits wrecking Australia. :roll:

It's because you're one of them. :smack
I am out there every day building this country -
making it a better place.
What do you do?
I don't support cultural Marxists and leftism like you do, so you aren't making it a better place.
You are making it worse. Much, much worse.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25815
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by Black Orchid » Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:09 am

Sir Bobby wrote:I support:
Whatever side gives us a postal vote on 100 different issues -
with the democracy ruling - the result binding.

Until then I think they're all a load of power hungry megalomaniacs.

X 2

None of them care what we want. That's painfully obvious. They only pretend to care, just enough, to stay in power as we have no really viable party alternatives ... yet. By the time the alternatives are really viable it will be too late. In certain parts of Australia it already is too late to turn back the clock.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18866
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by Bobby » Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:37 am

Black Orchid wrote:
Sir Bobby wrote:I support:
Whatever side gives us a postal vote on 100 different issues -
with the democracy ruling - the result binding.

Until then I think they're all a load of power hungry megalomaniacs.

X 2

None of them care what we want. That's painfully obvious. They only pretend to care, just enough, to stay in power as we have no really viable party alternatives ... yet. By the time the alternatives are really viable it will be too late. In certain parts of Australia it already is too late to turn back the clock.

Thanks Orchid,
Lets have 100 questions on the ballot -
let's not waste this ballot on one question about homos.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25815
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by Black Orchid » Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:42 am

We don't need 100 questions but we definitely do need some on immigration!!

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat Aug 12, 2017 4:32 pm

Personally I don't care what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes, including homos, so long as they don't rub it in my face.
So when the Gay marriage topic came up years ago, I didn't care one way or the other.
But in recent times the queers have been rubbing their perverions in my face, and everyone elses too, with the likes of compulsory 'Safe Schools'
poofter propaganda.
Now they (the queers) aren't satisfied with allowing the community at large setting standards and are determined to force their perversity
on to us via elite imposition, which means the issue isn't really about being allowed to get married.
It's now quite apparent that SSM is just a stepping stone to legalising paedophilia.
Homos can already gain legal access to minors via adoption and a "marriage" will add standing to their adoption applications.

Child sex abuse on girls is usually perpetrated by a heterosexual family member, the father as often as not.
Although as much as feminazis deny it, 25% of paedophiles are female.
Child sex abuse on boys is almost always perpetrated by a homosexual male .. clergy, youth leaders, teachers ect.

Mark my words, if gay marriage becomes legal, homosexual paedophiles will adopt boys to tamper with.
And when caught will get the adopted minor to say it was consensual ... and the courts will go lighter on them.
And then they (the queers) will lobby to lower the age of consentual homosexual activity.

Not long after that homosexuality will be re-criminalised ... whether they're chemically castrated, hung or burnt at the stake is anyone's guess.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Same Sex Marriage Debacle.

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat Aug 12, 2017 4:55 pm

Ah, so I'm allowed back in now ... I gather someone in ASIO didn't like my comment that the gay marriage debacle will end like the French Revolution, because that implies insurrection ... either that of some of the brass at DSD are raging poo punchers :P

Anyway, back when Abbot was PM the a gay marriage promoter here stated polls give favourable for gay marriage, I stated the only way to prove that would be to hold a referendum on the issue.
Not long after that PM Tony announces a plebiscite on the question. Not as good as a referendum, but cheaper, so I figured the next best thing.
Tony got rolled by Malcolm, and Malcolm went to election with Tony's plebiscite promise.

The queers realising the public would show the pro gay marriage poll results claims/propaganda would be disproven, because even in Labor heartland Western Sydney gays are about as popular as a dirty butt plug (and are bashed, so move to Paddington and Newtown near the city), had no option but to force the issue onto the electorate against the public's best instincts.

Then came the ALP opposition and Senate obstructionism. Now Malcolm & Co intend on having a postal plebiscite, which the queers intend blocking via the High Court, because the High Court has already condemned Howard's Marriage Act (between a man and a woman).

According to an Australian article on Thursday, it seems my suggestion of a referendum was the best choice, because unlike an ordinary parliamentary bill the Senate can only reject a referendum option once, and then the HoR can submit it to the Governor General to be signed off on.

So now I'm opposing the plebiscite in favour of a referendum.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests