Well by independent accounts the evangelising is not minimal, but widespread. And in any case, any evangelising at all is a violation of the program conditions.Jovial Monk wrote:Didn’t make a blanket statement, said some kids had been helped. So if the evangelising is minimal I think the program is worthwhile. Or are your convictions so insecure you can’t stand an argument to the contrary?
As for convictions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/010bc/010bcd623b5d45734f5935427db20da45bc00ee3" alt="Wink ;)"
Seriously though any convictions as in beliefs (on virtually any topic/issue/subject) .. well they're malleable depending on evidence and/or personal experiences.
As for insecurities, um ... well most of us do at various stages of life ... as a teen it would have been related to having an atractive partner, bit of egoism I spoze ... in early 20s it was more about finding a permanent and affordable place to live, so at age 25 bought 25 acres for $25,500. No house yet, but the rationale is not having to pay rent when I'm old and decrepit. These days I don't have much to be insecure about, I've become a cynical and contemptuous smartarse who couldn't be bothered worrying what others think of me, because ultimately it just doesn't matter. Not many things do.
As for not being able to cope with countering arguments, well no, I enjoy it if someone can prove me wrong, because it makes me go back and reconsider my own argument. But so far you haven't presented a satisfactory argument, nor even shown the material or link to the poll you cite as supporting your position/argument. So far your argument is no better than the jesus freaks unsubstaniated self appraisal.