Given the vacuous nature of your previous posts on the subject I am sure you have not read anything at all about Afganistan.Postul8 wrote:I'd say that was profound, except I'm sure I've read it somewhere elseJW Frogen wrote: Civilisation is hard, hard people build it. But only democracy allows the rest to feel like surrendering slaves at their own leisure.
Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- JW Frogen
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
which subject, old Frogen? Civilisation, democracy or being hard?JW Frogen wrote:Given the vacuous nature of your previous posts on the subject I am sure you have not read anything at all about Afganistan.Postul8 wrote:I'd say that was profound, except I'm sure I've read it somewhere elseJW Frogen wrote: Civilisation is hard, hard people build it. But only democracy allows the rest to feel like surrendering slaves at their own leisure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2f37/b2f374a6e5286029356d607dd92879bac6591674" alt="Laughing :lol:"
- JW Frogen
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
All three, and it would seem you would need some civilisation-democracy Viagra.Postul8 wrote: which subject, old Frogen? Civilisation, democracy or being hard?
Many men on the Left do.
Nothing to be ashamed of, see your doctor.
Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan....should Oz as well?
Seeing as we have a thread regarding Afghanistan, and Yankmania is opening stating that she believes her 'allies' need to step up and be prepared to sacrifice more of their young & best to a seemingly fruitless cause, I'd like to sound out opinions on whether Australia should bow & scrape, or say 'talk to da hand'?
My understanding of our presence in Afghanistan is purely for reconstruction purposes. The combat troops we have there are providing security for reconstruction teams and don't go actively seeking combat with the Taliban. I could be wrong. I realise the SAS are there, undoubtedly supporting multi-national incursions but hardly on a deliberate confrontational basis. I've heard it mooted that should we buckle to an increase in the ANZUS premium
likely a separate battalion of 500 personnel would be formed, specifically for combat operations.
Should we, or shouldn't we?
My understanding of our presence in Afghanistan is purely for reconstruction purposes. The combat troops we have there are providing security for reconstruction teams and don't go actively seeking combat with the Taliban. I could be wrong. I realise the SAS are there, undoubtedly supporting multi-national incursions but hardly on a deliberate confrontational basis. I've heard it mooted that should we buckle to an increase in the ANZUS premium
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Should we, or shouldn't we?
- JW Frogen
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
Australia is certainly doing more than NATO, except the US (of course) and the UK, so we have not succumbed to that European "who cares of the Talaban win and enslave an entire nation again and then sponor attacks against us mentality) and Australia is in offensive operations.
We are punching above our weight.
Which is probably why Obama wants us to punch more rather than say, Holland or France.
We are punching above our weight.
Which is probably why Obama wants us to punch more rather than say, Holland or France.
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
Now I KNOW I've seen that one before!!JW Frogen wrote: We are punching above our weight.
- JW Frogen
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
All you have to do now is think before you post.Postul8 wrote:Now I KNOW I've seen that one before!!JW Frogen wrote: We are punching above our weight.
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
about what, precisely? Pick the subject you think I know least about, Frogger, and let's have at it, eh?? I have two-thirds of a very nice Pinot Noir to go yet.JW Frogen wrote:All you have to do now is think before you post.Postul8 wrote:Now I KNOW I've seen that one before!!JW Frogen wrote: We are punching above our weight.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2f37/b2f374a6e5286029356d607dd92879bac6591674" alt="Laughing :lol:"
- JW Frogen
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
I will take Cricket for 100.Postul8 wrote:
about what, precisely? Pick the subject you think I know least about, Frogger, and let's have at it, eh?? I have two-thirds of a very nice Pinot Noir to go yet.
Re: Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
In the Australian -v- West Indies test series of 1977-78, what was the second innings batting score of the Master Blaster, IVA Richards?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests