That'd be right. Why wouldn't a dodgey character support another dodgey character by casting their vote for them?Neferti~ wrote:Our mate, aussie, voted for Clive. ...
Hmm, Gillard & Co thought they could prevent scrutiny of their past dodgey dealings by criminalising criticism of them, like they were a monarchy.
So what are the chances Palmer got a seat in govt, not just to create more favourable conditions for his business, but as an attempt to gain some impunity
for the plethora of dodgey dealings he's done?