Howard backed an ETS!
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
Not in my opinion.
Why do you think it is pathetic and embarrassing? I mean apart from your personal biases.
Why do you think it is pathetic and embarrassing? I mean apart from your personal biases.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
I know all that. I was just voicing an opinion ..... I can say what I think, can't I?Rorschach wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
you keep missing the point Nef... try again tomorrow.![]()
A few hints.... The Leftards say Howard backed an ETS...
well what's the real truth?
Anyway ..........
- Hebe
- Posts: 1483
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 6:49 pm
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
How about using Wikipedia as his reference for climate change information? You don't get much dumber than that.Rorschach wrote:Not in my opinion.
Why do you think it is pathetic and embarrassing? I mean apart from your personal biases.
OK?
OK.
The better I get to know people, the more I find myself loving dogs.
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
My two bobs worth is Hunt knows they be cutting back on Coal burning, which is the last thing Coal in the ition wants Hunt to have anything to do with. Hunt is terrified of being seen wanting for Coal to stop Coal dumping Carbon dumping into the air we breath.
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
Question. Now that John Howard has admitted he and Greg Hunt backed an ETS for no more than political expediency. Will Tony Abbott admit that he and Greg Hunt are against an ETS for no other reason than political expediency?
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
We keep exporting coal, so if we're seen to condemn it - we're going to look like hypocrites. However we're going to fall behind the rest of the world if we don't embrace an ETS sooner rather than later. Most modern countries are trying to reduce their emissions, but not us. We're going to be the world's biggest quarry and stuff climate change. This is why the Liberals are known as regressive.DaS Energy wrote:My two bobs worth is Hunt knows they be cutting back on Coal burning, which is the last thing Coal in the ition wants Hunt to have anything to do with. Hunt is terrified of being seen wanting for Coal to stop Coal dumping Carbon dumping into the air we breath.
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
I think you're onto something there Das. Abbott has a large redneck supporter base and on principle they're denialists.DaS Energy wrote:Question. Now that John Howard has admitted he and Greg Hunt backed an ETS for no more than political expediency. Will Tony Abbott admit that he and Greg Hunt are against an ETS for no other reason than political expediency?
- Super Nova
- Posts: 11793
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
Climate change is real.
Invest in carbon sinks, renewable energy and global control system companies. Pick the one's where silly governments will tax the punters to fund initiatives... your on a winner.
Mitigation is the key. Adaption alone will be a long term loser.
Politics is more about appearing to do something than doing something.
Invest in carbon sinks, renewable energy and global control system companies. Pick the one's where silly governments will tax the punters to fund initiatives... your on a winner.
Mitigation is the key. Adaption alone will be a long term loser.

Politics is more about appearing to do something than doing something.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
Well that is apparently a lie.Hebe wrote:How about using Wikipedia as his reference for climate change information? You don't get much dumber than that.Rorschach wrote:Not in my opinion.
Why do you think it is pathetic and embarrassing? I mean apart from your personal biases.
OK?
OK.
He said he was referencing it to see what the latest in "public"' opinion and net update was.
Where else would be a good start for that then? Hmmmm... Good place for a general reference.
you shouldn't knock him, after all... he is a true believer.

DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Howard backed an ETS!
No because Greg Hunt is an AGW true believer.DaS Energy wrote:Question. Now that John Howard has admitted he and Greg Hunt backed an ETS for no more than political expediency. Will Tony Abbott admit that he and Greg Hunt are against an ETS for no other reason than political expediency?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests