Yes sure Neferti.Neferti~ wrote:
Instead of griping, Mantra, go over there and HELP them. Or do it here and stop whinging.
I give money to these people, why don't you? Unfortunately, I can't travel, otherwise I would DO something.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Yes sure Neferti.Neferti~ wrote:
Instead of griping, Mantra, go over there and HELP them. Or do it here and stop whinging.
I give money to these people, why don't you? Unfortunately, I can't travel, otherwise I would DO something.
Funny guy.... wot...Aussie wrote:Cue the small man forging arsehole to the rescue of mantra. Careful, Neferti, or they'll be calling you a stalker and bully now.
I can't believe that, you Mantra, would be so unusually GREEN to think that I would lie?mantra wrote:Yes sure Neferti.Neferti~ wrote:
Instead of griping, Mantra, go over there and HELP them. Or do it here and stop whinging.
I give money to these people, why don't you? Unfortunately, I can't travel, otherwise I would DO something.
You and Aussie are incredibly sensitive. I'm sure you're very generous Neferti.Neferti~ wrote:
I can't believe that, you Mantra, would be so unusually GREEN to think that I would lie?
Oh I do donate money. John Curtain Research Centre that does cancer research is a good one and there are lots of other Charities.
AiA in Atlanta wrote:Environmentalists tell us to fear the growing world population but what they don't tell us is that the rate of increase has been falling since the early 1960's and the number of new people added has been falling since the 1980's. Throughout the world birthrates are falling.
Cool. The population is going to keep increasing for another 50 years yet (according to your projections)AiA in Atlanta wrote:The world population peaks at 9.2 billion in 2075. This is a long, long way from the apocalypse forecast in the 1970's. And they can all be easily fed. The population explosions are petering out and the declines are bottoming out.
It wasn't that long ago that we had a glut of sheep in Australia. The government could easily have distributed tens of thousands of carcasses to third world countries but they didn't. They ordered them shot and buried. Before that there was a glut of grain in the west but instead of distributing that to the third world it was taken out to sea and dumped. Makes sense???mantra wrote:The population has tripled in half a century. If there was such an abundant supply of food - why do so many people in third world countries starve?
Can't argue with thatmantra wrote:Overfishing and overfarming is causing immense depletion of future food sources. Farmed meat is full of chemicals and hormones while our vegetables are genetically modified and sprayed with toxins
True. Thanks to the IMF, WTO and free trade - many nations which were once self sufficient in feeding themselves and selling locally now have to compete with cheaper imports. As we've seen happen here - it no longer becomes viable to grow certain crops and they eventually disappear. It's far worse for the poorer nations who once had decent agriculture - enough to at least feed their communities, but have lost the land to the mining corporations.Super Nova wrote:I am with the environment movement in part and I am beginning to think that a doomsday scenario is likely. All we need a one big environmental disaster that effects most of the food belts around the world and it will be on.
Just like all other life here on Earth. Like bacteria in a petri dish, we will continue our population growth, comsuming all available resources, shitting in our own back yard until we run out of the resources and have a die back. Like rabbits in spring.
We are at the mercy of the giant global food corporations and their experiments. Even here - food labelling is an issue and not transparent. There might be more calories available now - but what's used to create them?AiA in Atlanta wrote:In spite of all the billions that have been added the world food supply in calories per head has improved dramatically.
Well we do have a global organisation called the UN, one would think if it was actually doing its job these sort of wasteful things would not occur. Mind you perishable goods do not travel well, nor do that have a long "shelf" life. Never heard of dumping grain at sea, seems an expensive way to deal with it.It wasn't that long ago that we had a glut of sheep in Australia. The government could easily have distributed tens of thousands of carcasses to third world countries but they didn't. They ordered them shot and buried. Before that there was a glut of grain in the west but instead of distributing that to the third world it was taken out to sea and dumped. Makes sense???
Of course you have proof to back up all your claims as usual don't you mantra. What poorer nations were they and what companies took over their agricultural lands?True. Thanks to the IMF, WTO and free trade - many nations which were once self sufficient in feeding themselves and selling locally now have to compete with cheaper imports. As we've seen happen here - it no longer becomes viable to grow certain crops and they eventually disappear. It's far worse for the poorer nations who once had decent agriculture - enough to at least feed their communities, but have lost the land to the mining corporations.
Users browsing this forum: Bobby and 18 guests