Labor cooked the books-$4.5 billion gone

[mellie]

Tom, the new Liberal NSW state government made a special point of saying that despite the gaping big hole in the NSW budget, they will keep their promises.

They could be like Labor and use this as an excuse to back-out , (like with Gillard and her No carbon-tax pre-electoral promise)...but they have made it clear despite the appalling waste of funds ....the show will go on, they will keep their promises.


Typical of Labor to accuse the Libs of politicking , when it's clear, they don't even have to try, they have already won the election.

This is Labors way of saying, "We don't want to answer this question, or explain how we misplaced' $4.5 billion " So catty...so Labor...

Perhaps a royal/federal inquiry would jolt their memory?


Oh...I know...perhaps the hackers who hacked Gillards computer stole this too?

[harvey]

Most new govts do it. Rudd/Swan were bleating about “the inflation genie is out the bottle” while poor old Ted doesn’t know what day it is I think. Like has been said, SOP.

Rudd Swan didnt say the inflation genie was out of the bottle after taking government. The inflation figures can be meaured so that would have been easily dismissed.

[harvey]

They could be like Labor and use this as an excuse to back-out , (like with Gillard and her No carbon-tax pre-electoral promise)...but they have made it clear despite the appalling waste of funds ....the show will go on, they will keep their promises.

Or like Gillard create a tax over a fictional issue based entirely on a scaremongering campaign to cover the blowout.

[Jovial Monk]

They said exactly that, early 2008.

[Neferti]

They said exactly that, early 2008.

So you voted more of the same? How smart are you then?

[harvey]

They said exactly that, early 2008.

No they didn't.
Weighted Average across All Capital Cities

Dec 07 to Mar 08 1.3
Apr 08 to Jun 08 1.5
Jul 08 to Sep 08 1.2
Oct 08 to Dec 08 -0.3


So, do you want to try some other spin?

[mellie]

They said exactly that, early 2008.

At least Howard had the decency to take his GST to the polls,(let people cast a vote on it) and didn't base it on one of the worlds greatest lies ever told...A Global Warmongering theory to fund UN autocracy and elitist aristocracy to ensure their own future prosperity trickles down their own families not those who weren't born Zionist European Jews.

They still haven't justified why they plan to give the UN 10% of our nations carbon-tax revenue.

Why don't they be honest, call it what it is... a global domination tax!

____________________________

Their desire is to govern the world from a Utopian post WWIII Israel.

Turn Israel into a commonwealth, their own.

[harvey]

They still haven't justified why they plan to give the UN 10% of our nations carbon-tax revenue.

Because it will drop the world's temperatures.
And as Tim Flannery has stated "f we cut emissions today, global temperatures are not likely to drop for about a thousand years."
So even with the world having zero emissions then there's be no noticeable impact for at least 1,000 years.
And remember the weather experts can't even predict acurately what tomorrow's weather will be. So give or take a few thousand years on Tim's comment.
Can you clarify that Mr Flannery?
"If the world as a whole cut all emissions tomorrow the average temperature of the planet is not going to drop in several hundred years, perhaps as much as a thousand years "


So basically Mr Flannery is saying that global warming and CO2 emissions is a load of rubbish.


One more thing, Tim advises that if Australia cuts their emissions by 5% as per the agenda of the ALP & Greens then the effect on the world's temperature will be (Mr Flannery)
" as I said it will be a very, very small increment."

Increment?
I thought that the objective was to decrease world temperatures, as afterall isn't that what global WARMING is in reference to?