
How about we talk about Australias fake and temporary employment figures, under-employment being created in the lead up to a Federal election, will these same jobs exist following the election, irrespective of who wins?
When will our journalists stop chasing shaddows, hypotheticals, and start nosing out the root cause for the odour that's coming from our Federal government?
Start asking the questions that matter, rather than trying to run a fear campaign based on speculation?
At this stage, a few greedy American drug companies CEOs have asked Trump to consider imposing pharmaceutical tarrifs.
Let's focus on Albanese's last 3 years in office, his achievements and his failure. Let's keep focused on his overall process and what has changed since he formed government 3 years ago.
Isn't this what OUR election should be about, rather than creating sensational headlines merely based on hypothesis?
As Albanese himself admitted, this hypothesis wouldn't be in the USs own best interests, so why is Albanese planting ABC journalists at his press conferences , answering their questions, then turning the finger of blame upon the journalists themselves for having caused fear, when it was his own cabinet's PR stunt to begin with?
To instill fear in voters, with a view to reassuring them that he has a solution to the problem, and will defend Australians right to our own tax-funded pharmaceutical benefits scheme, when it's a given that iraspective of who wins the election, it's a "Non Issue" for Australians in the whole scheme of what's really happening behind the ALP screens.
ALP are taking control of Aussies MSM ( News headlines on TV) , however they're forgetting that the average 70 year old ( my parents for example) are now actively engaged with other sources of information, X, and delving into figures themselves, ( no need for journalists anymore) .
Duttons overlooking the underlying reason for why Albanese handled the Chinese warship incident the way he did.
Deep research required. This should include Duttons own minister for defence formally addressing the issue with China, not Labors ministers, because there's always at least two sides of a story. My own research has discovered that the ALP were advised by China of their intentions. The question is, why is Albanese claiming otherwise? Claiming his ministers weren't given notice?
Too premature to be addressing it with the media, I would have waited until we had more facts and an election date at least, because we don't want this issue falling on deaf or tired ears as they're heading to the polls.
Guaranteed, Albanese plans to obscure the incident as much as possible, meaning it will all end up too hard and Australians will focus more on Albanese's pre- electoral sweeteners than other more critical issues we really should be.