Mark Latham

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Mark Latham

Post by Black Orchid » Thu Jul 12, 2018 6:31 pm

Former Opposition leader Mark Latham is tossing up a return to politics, but it's not clear which party would make the best fit for the one-time Labor leader who has since been exiled from the party.

Mr Latham appeared with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson on Sky News last night, but said he was still undecided on whether he would join her party.

"I've not made any decision — I do get people urging me, mainly on the basis, they say, that the country's gone crazy," he said.

"When you look at the political correctness, the identity politics, the anti-white racism.

"People so often say to me 'the country's gone mad. What's happened? Why has it changed so badly in the last decade. You should get in and do something'."

Senator Hanson said she would love to have him beside her in Parliament.

"Mark knows that I'd be quite happy to have him on board, but Mark's his own person," she said.

"Whether he wants to get involved in politics again, that's up to Mark."

Mr Latham has voiced a pre-recorded robocall message for One Nation ahead of the upcoming byelection in Longman, north of Brisbane.

In that message, he warns voters not to trust his former party — a move which came as a surprise to Liberal Democrats Senator David Leyonhjelm.


Mr Latham joined Senator Leyonhjelm's party last year.

And Senator Leyonhjelm said he had also been in discussions with Mr Latham about a possible comeback over recent weeks.

"He still has to take into account the views of his wife, his kids and whether he actually wants to return to politics," Senator Leyonhjelm said.

"Going back into politics for the second time is a bit like getting married a second time.

"It's a triumph of hope over experience."

Mr Latham led Labor's unsuccessful election campaign against John Howard in 2004, quit politics the year after and swore he'd had enough of public life.

For its part, the Labor party has already declared it will never take Mr Latham back. It made that announcement after he joined the Liberal Democrats.

Opposition Leader Bill Shorten dismissed Mr Latham's robocalls as a "sideshow" and a "distraction" from the issues at the heart of upcoming by-elections, and Shadow Treasurer Chris Bowen labelled Mr Latham "a rat".

"I think the Australian people would see through the charlatan that he is, that he's become," Mr Bowen said.

"I say that with no relish. It's sad to see a former Labor Party leader sink to depths.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-10/m ... ty/9961924

The only charlatan conducting a side show is Shorten himself. As much as I disliked Latham when he was Opposition Leader, and tainted by the left, he seems to have matured and grown a brain.

Perhaps he is the one to finally help Pauline get something done.

cods
Posts: 6433
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:52 am

Re: Mark Latham

Post by cods » Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:11 am

two BIG EGOS black orchid...

dont think so...if they could work together they would make a formidable party for sure....

both blunt and straight to the point.. like Trump its not very popular at the moment TRUTH that is..

we are brain washed into letting the PC crowd rule the roost......
Trump is clumsy so is Pauline..the gaffs they make are always highlighted which makes them look bad..

I loved the way the Queen had to dodge Trump..I bet they had a massive laugh about that she didnt bat an eyelid....I mean for a second there you couldnt see her.. :rofl :rofl :rofl

User avatar
The Mechanic
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:23 pm

Re: Mark Latham

Post by The Mechanic » Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:20 pm

I think its hilarious at how the Labor heads are exploding about Marks robo calls... :rofl

they'd have been far better off ignoring him 100%..

instead, they lost their minds and it got 1000% of air time that it shouldn't have received...
Beware the Fury of a Patient Man Q WWG1WGA ▄︻╦デ╤一

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Mark Latham

Post by Black Orchid » Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:16 pm

Worth a read ...
Politicians are responsible for the drought

David Flint The Spectator Australia 26 October 2019

‘I’m going to make a shitload of money.’ Peter, a farmer, listened intently to the merchant banker boasting to the grandly-named Global Food Forum. Because the politicians had changed the rules under their National Water Initiative, the banker explained he’d been able to buy up a large number of agricultural water rights without owning any farmland.

As water became scarce the price would go up and he’d make a killing.

That banker was lucky to have escaped without the thrashing he so richly deserved.

Not content with creating a speculators’ paradise on the backs of farmers, the politicians invented sacrosanct ‘environmental flows’ which run untapped though farming land and must now flow out to sea.

Under the Constitution, Canberra has no role over the environment.

But High Court judges decided the government did if it had entered into some treaty about the environment, thus changing the Constitution without the people’s consent and probably without their knowledge.

It was all so different once.

Politicians supported farmers. My earliest recollection of a drought were in war-time, with warnings to save water over every tap and water trains sent from Sydney to relieve the country.

Not so today. Farmers are now being obliged to sell their breeding herds. They’re being forced off the land by the banks, some are taking their own lives, and all the while, ‘environmental’ water is still flowing down the Murray-Darling into the sea.

Too late for many, the NSW Parliament, its Nationals more obsessed with pushing abortion and even infanticide, is at last appropriating these so-called environmental flows for agriculture.

The plight of the dairy farmers has been exacerbated by the mismanagement of what was glibly called ‘dairy market deregulation’. This easy formula is like all those PR-designed packages the politicians like to pretend are ‘reforms,’ disasters like the National Water Initiative, the NBN and that charter for jerry-building, ‘outsourcing building approvals’.

When the politicians deregulated the dairy industry two decades ago, they surely weren’t so naive as to think this was the competitive market usually assumed in Economics 1.01. With any sense they would have realised that without protection, dairy farmers would be left naked and at the mercy of the increasingly-powerful supermarkets.

Almost a decade ago, the supermarkets, led by Coles, struck. They decreed that a litre of milk would be sold below the cost of production, $1. The farmers would bear the cost of bringing the customers in.

The politicians proved completely useless in fixing up the mess they had created. They did nothing to stop this outrage against every worthwhile tenet of a decent competitive market.

This, and removing vast amounts of water from agricultural use for fictional environmental flows, is leading to the destruction of dairy farming in Australia.

The exception are those farms, especially in Tasmania, which the politicians have allowed to fall under the ultimate control and strategic direction of the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party. The milk from these farms, probably not even producing tax, will be flown to China where it will fetch high prices.

The politicians have ensured that Australia will soon be a net importer of often inferior food, as we have already become with fish, notwithstanding our enormous coastline.

A few valiant voices have been raised against this. Pauline Hanson, looked down on by the elites, warned of what was about to happen last year; few took notice. Now, against the wishes of the government, she has launched a senate inquiry. Calling for the declaration of a national emergency and the urgent provision, with army involvement, of fodder, water and freight through loans similar to the $60b lent to university students, Alan Jones has rallied enormous support but is being ignored by know-all politicians.

Prime Minister Morrison shows every sign of forgetting that he did not so much win the election as Bill Shorten lost it.

In the meantime, Farmer Peter tells of the un-Australian regime under which all Australian farmers are now forced to operate. As if they were in some communist ‘peoples republic’, they are watched through satellites by the environmental secret police. They and the politicians they serve have an insane hatred of water being used to grow food.

In at least South Australia, farmers are now being bribed to fill in their dams. Aided by federal grants, contractors are offering those who keep their dams the free installation of ‘low-flow bypass devices’. These strictly limit the amount of water that can come into their dams. If farmers refuse, they’re told they’ll have to pay for them when they’re soon made compulsory.

The result is, as Peter says, a man-made or rather politician-made drought .

This persecution by the environmental secret police is constant and appallingly un-Australian. In Queensland more draconian laws have just been rammed through the single-chamber parliament concerning agricultural practices which the noted scientist Professor Peter Ridd says do not and cannot affect the Great Barrier Reef.

The Queensland government is already notorious for what they did to farmer Dan McDonald who fed his starving cattle with his own mulga. As any Australian would ask, what’s wrong with that? He was prosecuted and fined, but not with the nominal fines contemplated but rarely if ever imposed for holding Brisbane to ransom with some ‘climate emergency’ demonstration. Farmer McDonald was fined an unbelievable $110,000.

Yet when Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk was recently questioned about this notorious case on Sky TV, her defence was to deny any knowledge of it.

Is there any doubt that the McDonald case is but the tip of an iceberg?

The liquidation of our farmers is yet another example of the way in which our delinquent, incompetent and self-interested politicians are determined to wreck Australia leaving it a net food importer, defenceless, with unbearably costly energy, inadequate law and order, immigration at unsustainable levels and educational standards spiralling down.

How long can Australians put up with this? As with the English in 1688, we need a ‘Bloodless (or Glorious) Revolution’.

Mark Latham

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 105 guests