cods wrote: ↑Tue Apr 02, 2019 7:38 am
brian ross wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2019 7:20 pm
cods wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2019 4:46 pm
every part of history has someone yelling CONSPIRACY....even bloody Elvis is still alive..
I didnt see pauline slamming any table claiming the govt initiated it....blah blah blah...like has been going on since 9/11....gawd they even post that crap on utube,....
get over it.. what she was saying was all taken out of context anyway.... any idiot can see that...
if you havent got the intelligence to see how she was manipulated.....then god help you...mickey mouse will be able to fool you guys.
She was not manipulated at all. She and Ashbey and Dixon all knew exactly what they were trying to do - to get money out of the NRA and allow the NRA, through them, to influence Australian politics. She was willing to accept thirty pieces of silver to sell Australia down the drain and to water down Australia's gun laws. How soon, as you once put it on aus.politics, before we have AK47s on every street corner, Cods?
She is an adult, Cods. She is responsible for her own actions. As the leader of a political party, she is responsible for what her Chief of Staff and her Senate candidates do and say in her and the Party's name. She has said she'll stand by them, despite them sinking deeper into the pooh and pulling her after them. That is her choice. Is it a wise one? I doubt it. However, it is like Pauline Hanson to make foolish choices. She has made them ever since she entered politics. She attacked Indigenous Australians. She attack Asian immigrants. She took on the Two Davids. She "knowingly defrauded the Commonwealth," over the number of members of Pauline Hanson One Nation Inc. She has attacked Muslim immigrants. She has tied herself up now with James Ashbey, who has, before this been heard on tape suggesting that they again defraud the Commonwealth of electoral funds still has her full confidence it seems. Pauline is simplistic and foolish. Very, very, foolish.
can you explain that in detail how you can possibly know that?....
By everything that has been published, Cods. Al Jazeera has made plain that their original target was the NRA, not the PHONies. The PHONies however, took the bait and ran with it. Al Jazeera just followed their lead. There was no manipulation at all. All Al Jazeera did was provide a hook up with the NRA and Koch industries...
on the one hand the left claim this was a sting to get the NRA and then lucky them the pair from One Nation fell into the sting..
now a lefty claims they knew exactly what they were doing and planned the whole thing....
And who would that be, Cods? I have always maintained that the PHONies foolishly got caught on a hook which was intended for the NRA, not them.
as they didnt get the MONEY....aFACT BRI BRI.....
Immaterial, Cods. Tell me, why do we put people on trial for attempted murder or for conspiracy? In neither case has the actual crime occurred, it's just been attempted or planned. One Nation was planning to get the money, it was planning to get the software, it was planning to get the help from the NRA which is, as I am sure you are well aware, based in the USA... They were conspiring to do that, Cods...
can you explain why this has been released at this time?......and to whom it benefits...would have to be the one who came up with the money this sting has cost....
any idea who that may be bri?
I have no idea as to why it was released at this time, Cods. I am not a member of the Al Jazeera editorial board, so I am not privy to their thinking. I can suggest that it was released at this time because of the upcoming election, when the PHONies and whether or not they should be voted for would be on the minds of many foolish Australians. As to whom it benefits? I would suggest the citizens of Australia, the voters. They have some of the PHONies' darkest secrets revealed to help them make up their mind whether they should vote for the PHONies or not.
I know you like to believe in mega conspiracies, Cods. Do you really think the ALP or the Tories had a hand in this? Really?
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair