Liberal Democratic Party

[IQS.RLOW]

No, you made the claim. It up to you to provide the resources.

[alevine]

No, you made the claim. It up to you to provide the resources.

I just did. Are you incapable of using a search function? Seriously, we aren't in a face-to-face debate IQS, you can open a new tab and do as I have told you. I'm simply pointing out the basis of which the LDP, a party you said you agree on everything with, supports increased speed limits. Are you now saying you don't agree with a libertarian principle where the state doesn't impose rules on individuals?

[IQS.RLOW]

No, you did no such thing. You made a claim and said I could find it somewhere.

You need to cut and paste or link it here. Leftys lie.

Are you are liar too? If not, then link it.

[alevine]

No, you did no such thing. You made a claim and said I could find it somewhere.

You need to cut and paste or link it here. Leftys lie.

Are you are liar too? If not, then link it.

http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q= ... _sdt=0%2C5
Sorry IQS, they all cost. But if you have a uni account, like I said, you can look them up for free.

Now tell me (this is a red herring for your information), do you support everything from the LDP or not? It seems you oppose their speed limit policy...

[IQS.RLOW]

party you said you agree on everything with, supports increased speed limits. Are you now saying you don't agree with a libertarian principle where the state doesn't impose rules on individuals

Again, with the strawman argument. You made a claim. I asked for evidence. You said it was out there somewhere. I asked you to post the evidence that you reckon is out there somewhere.

Seems you are unable to do so. Ergo, you are either lying or making it up. Post it and prove me wrong or STFU and GTFO...it's not rocket science.

[alevine]

party you said you agree on everything with, supports increased speed limits. Are you now saying you don't agree with a libertarian principle where the state doesn't impose rules on individuals

Again, with the strawman argument. You made a claim. I asked for evidence. You said it was out there somewhere. I asked you to post the evidence that you reckon is out there somewhere.

Seems you are unable to do so. Ergo, you are either lying or making it up. Post it and prove me wrong or STFU and GTFO...it's not rocket science.

I think it's a valid question though no? Your OP said you agree with everything the LDP has said. This new senator is a smart guy!

Well...do you or do you not agree with their speed limit policy? Seems to me you need to do a bit more research.

[IQS.RLOW]

Now tell me (this is a red herring for your information), do you support everything from the LDP or not? It seems you oppose their speed limit policy...

That's not a red herring. That is an actual question and one you should have asked before saying things like

a party you said you agree on everything with

and

Your OP said you agree with everything the LDP has said.

You must be very fit with all that jumping to conclusions, jumping the gun and running your mouth. Perhaps you should slow down and think for a change?

[alevine]

Now tell me (this is a red herring for your information), do you support everything from the LDP or not? It seems you oppose their speed limit policy...

That's not a red herring. That is an actual question and one you should have asked before saying things like

a party you said you agree on everything with

and

Your OP said you agree with everything the LDP has said.

You must be very fit with all that jumping to conclusions, jumping the gun and running your mouth. Perhaps you should slow down and think for a change?

and still can't answer? You must be a red herring in real life.