Gillards office denies leadership spill

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
mellie
Posts: 11811
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillards office denies leadership spill

Post by mellie » Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:12 am

skippy wrote:I have always taken a pride in our opportunity to vote in and vote out governments without military intervention or coups. I have always considered it a privilege to vote and hated it when others told me they didn't vote or donkey voted. But I would never vote forphony tony and Labor do not deserve to govern. So, for the first time in my life I will not be voting. No point voting Greens when I have to preference one of the majors. So I will just vote Greens in the senate and rip up my HORs ballot paper.

Skip... look at it this way, one of them will govern, so you need to decide which of the two is more inclined to uphold sovereignty, , even if it's against your principles.

Skip, The "New Labor" ...

....New Labour Internationalism (NLI) , The International Labour Organization (ILO) ... Hegemonic small (c) communist internationalism.

Read

“Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin,” by George Marlen.
“If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist Internationalism, then the Jewish race is doomed.”
In other words he’s saying that the Jews are totally in charge of Communist Internationalism, and if the world does not turn to a New World Order of Jewish Communist Internationalism, then the Jewish race is doomed. Interestingly, Internationalism is an early incarnation of globalisation, what we are seeing now.,,

Look, put it this way...


If we continue voting for "New Labour Internationalist's" (It's infiltrated the ALP ) this and want a fanatically micro-managed media to go with....then go for your life, vote Labor, or donkey vote.

We are in big trouble if we don't get this right soon.

If Turnbull was leading the Libs, then I would agree with you, we'd be fucked either way we voted.

Turnbull is an internationalist too.

The problem i am having is explaining 'New Labour internationalism" to "Old Labor voters" they just cant get their heads around it.

I think it's tragic, and think Liberals are close to enduring the same fate.

I am not kidding when I tell you Libs are the best chance we have.

Remember, I voted for Rudd in 2007..so it came as a bit of a shock to me also.

Now we need to get on with it.

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Gillards office denies leadership spill

Post by mantra » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:21 pm

I am not kidding when I tell you Libs are the best chance we have.
We have no chance. It's a choice between Tweedledee and Tweedledum. It's unbelievable that we have such low class, ignorant, greedy and corrupt politicians. Abbott has an agenda and the older he gets the more his religious leanings will take over. He will be in for as long as Howard if Labor is wiped out. Maybe longer and there won't be a thing we can do about it once his true colours emerge.

Don't believe everything you read. Look between the lines sometimes.

mellie
Posts: 11811
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillards office denies leadership spill

Post by mellie » Fri Mar 22, 2013 2:34 pm

mantra wrote:
I am not kidding when I tell you Libs are the best chance we have.
We have no chance. It's a choice between Tweedledee and Tweedledum. It's unbelievable that we have such low class, ignorant, greedy and corrupt politicians. Abbott has an agenda and the older he gets the more his religious leanings will take over. He will be in for as long as Howard if Labor is wiped out. Maybe longer and there won't be a thing we can do about it once his true colours emerge.

Don't believe everything you read. Look between the lines sometimes.

At least we have a 'slight' chance with Libs, there's absolutely no chance with UN's International Labour Org, (ILO) and their Agenda 21.

The consequences of Agenda 21 are more sinister than even John Howard probably thought.

Look...

http://www.ilo.org/public/english/stand ... /esp-4.pdf


You wont even know this country in another 15 years if they have their way.

None of us will.

We have no choice, Libs are our only hope, and I know, they may crash and burn too, depends on whether Tony Abbott can resist the Internationalists bribes, gifts, party donations.

If Tony blows it, then we are screwed.

Goodbye old Australia, hello Oceania, 1984...complete with news-speak and double-speak.

mellie
Posts: 11811
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillards office denies leadership spill

Post by mellie » Fri Mar 22, 2013 2:44 pm

Edit: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/stand ... /esp-4.pdf

re- ILO and A21 and LA21.


I provided the wrong link in the above article.

This is regarding International Labour Organisation (ILO) & Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 (A21 & LA21)


It's important that some of you start familiarising yourselves with New Labour internationalism and it's hegemonic agenda.

Because believe me when I tell you, a vote for Labor, is no longer a vote for the ALP.

It's a vote for the ILO.

mellie
Posts: 11811
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillards office denies leadership spill

Post by mellie » Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:37 pm

6.28pm Joel Fitzgibbon has told Triple J's Hack program that he believes Labor has chosen to lose the September election.

When asked this afternooon if he thought the party has chosen to lose the next election, Fitzgibbon replied:

"I do".

He then went on to say that if we went to the polls right now, knowing that some Labor MPs have less than 10 per cent of the marginal vote, they would lose their seats.

"What is going on?," he said.

He added that: "What makes it so weird...they're sacrificing themselves..in that somehow under the current leadership things will improve".

Fitzgibbon said that many Labor MPs were still operating under 100-year-old architecture in the Labor party, being influenced by others outside of the party including trade unions.

"It lets the party down," he said.

While he did not feel let down, he said the party was being let down.
http://www.news.com.au/national-news/pm ... 6603009329


"being influenced by others outside of the party including trade unions."
Those who know the truth, need to be frank with Australian voters and enable us to make an informed choice.

Not many Australians realise their government is being micro-managed via the ILO by internationalists and those who have vested interest in it's survival.

Labor needs to be confronted with a number of questions, the concern I have is that even our opposition aren't asking the types of questions they really should be asking...(ie, Internationalism, and their involvement with the ILO, who are dictating , everything from Media and communications legislation and Industrial law reforms to social and 'local area' policy.
My concern is the degree of influence the International Labour Organisation (ILO) has over Australian policy.

Though having said this, I think Liberals would prefer Gillard remains PM until the election, because she's a sure bet, and they know they stand to benefit more from a greater victory than a modest win.

Still have doubts and think their ILO involvement has little or no effect on Labors policy's?

...


Please read the following article, their obsession with complying with ILO standards...





http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor ... -bicp.html


It's no secret, nor is it "conspiracy theory".... it's fact, some of you need to accept.

Mr Mighell has also been involved in separately taking the Government to the ILO over its laws.

Ms Burrow said "there are and there will be areas of unfinished business" with the new laws and unions would push for changes.

A spokeswoman for Workplace Relations Minister Julia Gillard said the laws would "align Australia with key ILO conventions".

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor ... z2OGedn0qj" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Gillards office denies leadership spill

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sat Mar 23, 2013 2:07 am

Looks like Gillard used Crean as the fall guy to bring on the spill.

Gillard knew that key ministers would be out of the country and unavailable for the vote
She got Crean to call for the spill because she knew Rudd wasnt ready, so she got Crean to go public saying he was backing Rudd.
Text messages that morning show Kev wasn't on board
The sacking of Crean is a high farce and expect Crean to be handed a plum position elsewhere for being the sacrificial lamb.

The sneaky ranga bitch has got blood and shit all over her
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

mellie
Posts: 11811
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillards office denies leadership spill

Post by mellie » Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:43 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:Looks like Gillard used Crean as the fall guy to bring on the spill.

Gillard knew that key ministers would be out of the country and unavailable for the vote
She got Crean to call for the spill because she knew Rudd wasnt ready, so she got Crean to go public saying he was backing Rudd.
Text messages that morning show Kev wasn't on board
The sacking of Crean is a high farce and expect Crean to be handed a plum position elsewhere for being the sacrificial lamb.

The sneaky ranga bitch has got blood and shit all over her
You are giving her far too much credit, she's not the one choreographing this staged Labor production.


8-) .... Half time change sides... next batter up.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests