I have no idea what Gillard was on about. I don't take any notice of what she says anyhow.mellie wrote:
I almost felt bad after I read Nefs response, almost...![]()
Gillard has attempted to use her fathers death to gain public sympathy at a time when emotions are powerful.
She could have gone about it more subtly, ie, extended her thoughts and best wishes to family's who have lost a loved one this year, without mentioning her father...this is, without making it all about her.
I mean, who hasn't lost a loved one this and is not thinking about them this Xmas?
We all have, and she knows this, this is why she said it, she knew it would strike a chord.![]()
But we don't all use our grief to our political/career/financial advantage. It's just hollow, sorry.
Nef, there are plenty of people feeling a sense of loss this Xmas, many have lost their jobs.
Now, will she extend her condolences to these people also?
Or will we have to wait for her to lose hers before she gives this any more thought.
Did she mention the young Aussie men who lost their lives in Afghanistan this year? If not, why not? As far as I am concerned, they should all be home.
I wasn't disagreeing with you, as such, just that what you posted was in "poor taste", in my OPINION.
How was Baby's First Christmas?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/010bc/010bcd623b5d45734f5935427db20da45bc00ee3" alt="Wink ;)"